Skip to main content

Savage's Status

Within the company, Savage’s position was an odd one. A director, inventor, factory owner, and stockholder, he appears not to have had executive status.
Savage wanted to go to Washington to get the contract for the company; James Wheelock wanted to retain Thomas Dyer, of Washington, who had been a middleman in the first large beef contract handed out when the War started, to get the orders for them. Direct application to Washington seemed not to have proved fruitful for Wheelock, who testified that “all our (Wheelock’s) personal efforts to procure such a contract from the War Department had failed.” Dyer was authorized by Wheelock by his letter of September 9, , to obtain an order for 5,000 Savage pistols at $20 each, guaranteed deliveries 500 in October, 700 November, 1,000 in December , and 1,500 per month thereafter.

But at some date just before then, Savage, perhaps exasperated at Wheelock’s insistence on handling the business himself, wrote to General Ripley. He was well known in Washington and the letter must have come as no surprise; Ripley on September 10, , replied, apparently by telegram, ordering 5,000 “of your cavalry revolvers,” provided they be delivered at the rate of 1,000 per month. Savage in Middletown on the same day, 10 September, replied to Ripley accepting his terms. Secretary Wheelock and President Sebor refused to accept Savage’s contract, especially since he wanted compensation for it; they had committed themselves to paying $2 more or less to Dyer. Dyer originally wanted them to fix $22.50 as their contract price, saying he had in mind to apply for a pistol contract at that price. He implied he would then scout around and resell it by assignment to someone who manufactured pistols. Wheelock retorted their pistols weren’t worth more than $20 and that was the price they wanted to sell them for. Dyer was reassured on September 16 that he and he alone was authorized to treat for the Savage Revolving Firearms Company in the matter of a pistol contract.
On October 11, , General Ripley in accordance with the one-month proviso in his letter to Savage now notified the inventor that since the one month had elapsed with no deliveries, the order was annulled.
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

CHAPTER 17 The Starr Rises

From the catalog of Wallis and Wallis, British gun auctioneers ( 1962 ) at Lewes in Sussex, we read of the sale of a Starr revolver: Lot 1060 ... A 6 shot .44 Starr SA Army Perc Rev 14", brl 8", No. 51594, the top strap bearing old engraving Col. Colt Address New York, Good Condition but action As Found & frame screw not orig . Eben T. Starr of Yonkers, New York, might not have smiled at this latter day whimsey. Marking his re volver with the name of the man he dared challenge by launching a new revolving pistol business in 1858 was to him not funny. Though the modern gun bug who fraudulently marked this in the hope someone would bite on it as a hitherto unknown Colt double action revolver we trust was unsuccessful in his piracy, per haps the buyer at the Wallis and Wallis auction cherishes his purchase for what it is: one of the best and most modem revolvers of the Civil War era. Though complex inside at first glance, its parts are well thought out and reveal Star...
Post a Comment
Read more

CHAPTER 6 Rifle Muskets: Civil War Scandals

You place me in a most embarrassing position, Mr. Secretary. How is that, Mr. Wilkeson? the gaunt-faced Penn sylvanian queried, the lines of his expression amplified by the fatigue and, somewhat, disappointment with which he laid down his role as Secretary of War for Mr. Lincoln. Because, Mr. Cameron, the newspaperman re sponded, your contract for rifle muskets with the Eagle Manufacturing Company of Mansfield, Connecticut is for only 25,000 arms, and my friends there, whom I induced to engage in this business in expectation of your issuing a further order, as your assistant Mr. Scott assured me you would, will be sorely embarrassed in their operations on this small amount. Indeed this is bad news to me, Mr. Wilkeson, War Secretary Simon Cameron sympathetically observed, as he stuffed papers from his desk drawer into a large portfolio, scanning them briefly, consigning some to the waste basket. But as you can see, I am leaving office today; I believe Mister Stanton, who repla...
Post a Comment
Read more

French and Belgian Arms

French and Belgian materiel was considered next best to the Enfields, though the types and calibers were more varied than either Enfield or Austrian Lorenz arms. Basic pattern for the best rifles of both France and Belgium was the “carabine” of Captain Minie. Minie’s designs had exerted profound changes in the world’s small arms armament. That change was ably summed up by lexicographer Thomas Wilhelm after the War when he prepared his military dictionary. Said Wilhelm, “Minie Rifle. A species of fire-arm, invented by Capt. Minie, from whom it receives its name. It is certain in aim, and fatal in its results at 800 yards.” The claim was, if anything, inferior to the real capability of the Minie rifle. France in 1861 possessed a surplus of many arms. During the 1840 ’s the temporary procurement of guns designed by Thouvenin, Pontchara, Minie, and others kept the arsenals busy and the soldiers active testing them. Then came the Crimean War and France’s involvement on the side of Gr...
Post a Comment
Read more