Skip to main content

Basic Features of the Sharps

The basic principle of toggle-linking trigger guardlever and vertically sliding breechblock dated from that
Sharps New Model 1859 carbine illustrated in Official Records typified over 80,000 of this type bought by the North from Hartford gunmaker.
Sharps New Model  carbine illustrated in Official Records typified over 80,000 of this type bought by the North from Hartford gunmaker.
patent. Sharps’ sliding wedge breechblock is still with us; on artillery, as a rifle mechanism, and the leverlink-breech construction of the Sharps rifle, with its slide milled out on each side to reduce friction, is the genesis of the spring lever-toggle-breech action of the Borchardt-Luger automatic pistol.

No finer piece of precision manufacturing in steel and wood was available in the world in than a U. S. contract carbine; and among the best of these was the Sharps.
The “Model ” was the basis for the Civil War Sharps. If complete and original, perhaps its easiest detail for recognition is the R. S. Lawrence folding leaf rear sight, the spring-base of which is stamped R. s. lawrence/ patented/feb. 15th . The carbine sight leaf is short, not less in range, but short because of the short barrel requiring less drop at the breech to get the same elevation. It does not fall over the base spring retaining screw, as does the rifle leaf, and is graduated 2-8 for hundreds of yards. The slot is square-ended, as is the New Model Rifle sight leaf slot; the leaf is graduated 1-7. In the rifle was re-regulated, a leaf of substantially the same proportions now being used, graduated 1-8, and the slot rounded to slip over the base spring screw to let the leaf lie flat when set at battle sight. Mechanically, the -63 lockplates have the pellet primer patented by Sharps October 5, , and modified by R. S. Lawrence’s pellet feed shut-off, to conserve the pellet primers, patented April 12, . Sharps’ basic patent is stamped on the receiver left; the primer patents on the lockplates. On the barrel to the rear of the sight is new model or new model , and in front, the company marking sharp rifle/ manufg co/hartford conn. Serials numbers are on the top tang of the action body, to rear of the loading trough.
Winston O. Smith’s The Sharps Rifle (Morrow & Company, ) gives some details of mechanical changes:
Basic Sharps design had vertical sliding breechblock. Here, patent drawing for Lawrence gas-check ring or plate shows also Sharps breech. Design is patent No. 26504 of Dec. 20, 1859, and appeared in all Civil War Sharps carbines and rifles with sliding breech.
Basic Sharps design had vertical sliding breechblock. Here, patent drawing for Lawrence gas-check ring or plate shows also Sharps breech. Design is patent No. 26504 of Dec. 20, , and appeared in all Civil War Sharps carbines and rifles with sliding breech.
The tumblers in the models prior to were too small for the weight of the hammer and strength of the main spring and frequently broke. Often the separate sear springs in these same models also broke. The tumblers were made much 96,504.
R. S. LAWREJfCE
Dec. 20,.
New Sharps-made parts from Civil War surplus stores still being sold were used in 1960’s by author to complete stripped barrel-breech unit of New Model 1863 rifle (top). Below is Sharps New Model 1863 Carbine which has had Indian use, and butt is replaced by section of Springfield Rifle Musket butt, held by rawhide repair.
New Sharps-made parts from Civil War surplus stores still being sold were used in ’s by author to complete stripped barrel-breech unit of New Model  rifle (top). Below is Sharps New Model  Carbine which has had Indian use, and butt is replaced by section of Springfield Rifle Musket butt, held by rawhide repair.
stronger in the model, and the separate sear spring was eliminated from the models of and after, a thin extension of the lower branch of the mainspring serving as a sear spring.
To make possible the cleaning of the central section of the (flash) tube, a hole was drilled into it from the side of the block and normally closed by a small headless screw. The slot in this screw was too small, and when the threads inside became gummed with powder ... it was . . . impossible to remove the screw, and the screwdriver would strip the screw slot. In a screw with a large filaster (sic) head was (used).
The Sharps Rifle Manufacturing Company used special machines, tools, jigs, fixtures and gauges in making each particular part of the gun, and the parts of each model from to are interchangeable to a very great extent. The parts appear to be almost perfectly interchangeable for all percussion arms manufactured in and after.
It is interesting to note that the tumblers, bridles, mainsprings, and mainspring swivels of these later models ( and after) are interchangeable with the corresponding parts of the Models and Spencer repeating rifles and carbines, and the Sharps sear can also be interchanged by first grinding off part of the sear arm.
In , almost a century after it was made, I bought a used Sharps New Model barreled action. To this basic assembly I attached a used breechblock, and all new lock and stock parts, completing an “almost new” Sharps rifle from spare bits and pieces. Two details needed filing: the tumbler square, to receive the hammer, needed dressing down; and the stock and rear band required some compensating removal of metal. Otherwise, each part fitted the other as perfectly as if it had originally been put together that way, a tribute to the way in which President John C. Palmer’s Sharps Rifle Company workmen did their job under the U. S. Contract system.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

CHAPTER 6 Rifle Muskets: Civil War Scandals

You place me in a most embarrassing position, Mr. Secretary. How is that, Mr. Wilkeson? the gaunt-faced Penn sylvanian queried, the lines of his expression amplified by the fatigue and, somewhat, disappointment with which he laid down his role as Secretary of War for Mr. Lincoln. Because, Mr. Cameron, the newspaperman re sponded, your contract for rifle muskets with the Eagle Manufacturing Company of Mansfield, Connecticut is for only 25,000 arms, and my friends there, whom I induced to engage in this business in expectation of your issuing a further order, as your assistant Mr. Scott assured me you would, will be sorely embarrassed in their operations on this small amount. Indeed this is bad news to me, Mr. Wilkeson, War Secretary Simon Cameron sympathetically observed, as he stuffed papers from his desk drawer into a large portfolio, scanning them briefly, consigning some to the waste basket. But as you can see, I am leaving office today; I believe Mister Stanton, who repla

The Gatling Gun

Ager, Williams, Vandenberg, these have faded into history. The repeating gun most remembered from the war, and yet one which had a very confusing record of use therein, is that of Dr. Richard Jordan Gatling. I had the pleasure of witnessing how effectively Dr. Gatling had builded when I attended a meeting of the American Ordnance Association at Aberdeen the fall of 1957 . Mounted on a testing stand was a small bundle of barrels, dwarfed in seeming firepower by the huge cannon flanking it. But when the gunner pushed the button and that mighty mite whirred into action with a high-pitched snarling roar so rapidly that no individual explosions could even be sensed, I knew I had witnessed not only the world’s fastest-firing machine gun, and the world’s heaviest gun in weight of metal fired (a ton and a half in one minute), but a gun that was directly inspired by the Civil War special artillery General Butler bought from Dr. Gatling. First of Gatling’s guns was bulky wheeled carriage “c

CHAPTER 7 Injustice to Justice

In justice to Justice, it must be said that a recent examination of one of the muskets, for the supplying of which to the Union he was so villified, proves to be a reasonably well-assembled hodgepodge of surplus parts and at least as strong and reliable as the American parts from which it was built. But when Philip S. Justice, gunmaker-importer of Philadelphia, tried to get aboard the Federal musket contract gravy train, he both got more than he bar gained for—and Holt and Owen conversely gave him less.